Revive-adserver CVEs & Vulnerabilities
6 CVEs affecting Revive-adserver products, tracked from the National Vulnerability Database, with CVSS/EPSS scores and exploitation status.
Most Affected Products
A missing sanitisation vulnerability exists with user input in the stats-video.php script. The way URLs to this script were constructed did not follow best practices, and the output of the Smarty custom helper function url was neither properly encoded nor sanitised, allowing user‑supplied input to be reflected without escaping.
A bypass to the admin‑only restriction of the XML‑RPC API in Revive Adserver 6.0.7. The API response for the ox.login method returned a session ID cookie in the HTTP headers, and although the method correctly returned an error, the associated session was not invalidated. As a result, the leaked session ID could be used to perform subsequent API calls without restrictions.
A stored XSS vulnerabilities exists in the `maintenance-acl-check.php` and `maintenance-banners-check.php` tools of Revive Adserver 6.0.7. The issue was caused by entity names being displayed without proper escaping when inconsistencies were detected. Whether the XSS payload is executed when an administrator uses the affected maintenance tools is not entirely under the attacker's control.
Bypass to the fix for CVE-2026-34916. Variants of such vectors have been also reported by phucrio and offsetmd. The fix can be bypassed either by sending a disallowed but otherwise valid plugin identifier as `type`, or using the `ox.setChannelTargeting` XML-RPC API method.
A missing sanitisation vulnerability of user input in the zone-include.php script exists in Revive Adserver 6.0.7 and earlier. A low‑privileged user could exploit the refresh parameter of the iFrame invocation tag to perform reflected XSS attacks.
A bypass for CVE‑2026‑34913 exists with proper ownership validation that had not been applied to the reverse operation of linking campaigns and trackers through the `tracker-campaigns.php` script in Revive Adserver 6.0.7 and earlier. As a result, a low‑privileged user could link their trackers to campaigns owned by other managers on the same instance, leading to inconsistent ownership relationships.